Educational Information Only — Not Legal Advice

    This site provides educational information only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer for personalized guidance. Laws may change. Full DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

    Skip to main content
    Thai LawKNOWLEDGE AUTHORITY
    Last reviewed: by Anglo Siam Law Editorial Team
    Share:

    Educational Information Only

    The content on this page is for general educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every legal situation is unique. For matters involving investigation, arrest, litigation, or formal proceedings, consult a qualified legal professional.

    Back to Supreme Court Cases
    Labour — Non-compete

    Post-Employment Restraint of Trade — Reasonableness Standard

    Former Senior Employee v Former Employer

    Updated:
    Supreme Court (Labour division)
    Labour — Non-compete
    B.E. 2563 (2020)

    Composite summary — not a single reported case. This entry distils a settled line of Thai Supreme Court (Dika / ฎีกา) authority for legal education. It is not a transcript of one reported judgment, and the heading is not a citable case number. Do not cite it as specific case law — consult a Thai-qualified lawyer for the authoritative Dika number and current application.

    Facts

    Former employer sued for breach of 2-year industry-wide non-compete; employee argued unreasonable scope.

    Holding

    Supreme Court line applies a reasonableness test on scope, duration, geography, and consideration; overbroad clauses are unenforceable rather than read down.

    Reasoning

    CCC §150 (good morals) and Unfair Contract Terms Act B.E. 2540 constrain post-employment restraints; courts protect employee mobility while respecting legitimate employer interests.

    Significance

    Sets the contours of enforceable Thai non-compete clauses.

    Practical Takeaway

    Tailor non-competes to specific business / role / 6-24 months / clear consideration; blanket clauses fail.

    Cited Statutes

    • Civil and Commercial Code §150
    • Unfair Contract Terms Act B.E. 2540

    This entry summarises a representative line of authority from the Thai Supreme Court (ฎีกา). It is intended for general legal education only and is not a substitute for advice from a Thai-qualified lawyer. Individual Dika case numbers are being verified against primary sources; until then these entries are presented as composite doctrinal summaries.

    Professional Legal Assistance

    When a matter involves investigation, arrest, detention, litigation, or regulatory action, professional legal representation becomes essential.

    Anglo Siam Legal provides experienced legal services across Thailand for both Thai nationals and foreigners.

    feedback.wasThisHelpful