Educational Information Only — Not Legal Advice

    This site provides educational information only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer for personalized guidance. Laws may change. Full DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

    Skip to main content
    Last reviewed: by Anglo Siam Law Editorial Team
    Share:

    Educational Information Only

    The content on this page is for general educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every legal situation is unique. For matters involving investigation, arrest, litigation, or formal proceedings, consult a qualified legal professional.

    Back to Supreme Court Cases
    Employment — Termination

    Probationary Employees — Notice Required, Severance Not (Below 120 Days)

    Probationary Employee v Employer

    Updated:
    Supreme Court — Labour Division
    Employment — Termination
    B.E. 2556 (2013)

    Composite summary — not a single reported case. This entry distils a settled line of Thai Supreme Court (Dika / ฎีกา) authority for legal education. It is not a transcript of one reported judgment, and the heading is not a citable case number. Do not cite it as specific case law — consult a Thai-qualified lawyer for the authoritative Dika number and current application.

    Facts

    An employer terminated an employee on the final day of, or shortly after, a 119-day 'probation period' without paying severance and, in some reported cases, without notice. The employee challenged the termination, claiming that the probationary label did not exempt the employer from notice obligations under Section 17 LPA, and that misconduct allegations were not properly established.

    Holding

    The Supreme Court — Labour Division has held that probationary employees are 'employees' under the LPA from day one. They are entitled to advance notice under Section 17 (or payment in lieu) when dismissed without Section 119 cause. Severance under Section 118 is payable only after 120 days of continuous service; termination before that threshold does not trigger severance, but does still require lawful notice unless a Section 119 ground is proved.

    Reasoning

    The LPA does not recognise 'probation' as a separate legal category exempting employers from the notice or cause regime. The 120-day threshold for severance is a separate statutory rule and applies regardless of probationary status. Section 17 notice is independent of severance.

    Significance

    Clarifies one of the most commonly misunderstood areas of Thai employment law — that 'probation' does not mean 'fire at will'. Particularly relevant to foreign employers using imported HR norms.

    Practical Takeaway

    Even during probation, give one full pay-period's written notice or payment in lieu, unless Section 119 cause is genuinely established. Schedule probation reviews well before day 120 so that any dismissal can be properly documented.

    Cited Statutes

    • Labour Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998), Sections 17, 118, 119
    • Civil and Commercial Code, Section 582

    This entry summarises a representative line of authority from the Thai Supreme Court (ฎีกา). It is intended for general legal education only and is not a substitute for advice from a Thai-qualified lawyer. Individual Dika case numbers are being verified against primary sources; until then these entries are presented as composite doctrinal summaries.

    Professional Legal Assistance

    When a matter involves investigation, arrest, detention, litigation, or regulatory action, professional legal representation becomes essential.

    Anglo Siam Legal provides experienced legal services across Thailand for both Thai nationals and foreigners.

    feedback.wasThisHelpful