Educational Information Only — Not Legal Advice

    This site provides educational information only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer for personalized guidance. Laws may change. Full DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

    Skip to main content
    Thai LawKNOWLEDGE AUTHORITY
    Last reviewed: by Anglo Siam Law Editorial Team
    Share:

    Educational Information Only

    The content on this page is for general educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every legal situation is unique. For matters involving investigation, arrest, litigation, or formal proceedings, consult a qualified legal professional.

    Back to Supreme Court Cases
    IP — Copyright

    Copyright Authorship — Employment vs Commissioned Work

    Software Engineer v Former Employer

    Updated:
    Supreme Court (IP&IT appeal)
    IP — Copyright
    B.E. 2561 (2018)

    Composite summary — not a single reported case. This entry distils a settled line of Thai Supreme Court (Dika / ฎีกา) authority for legal education. It is not a transcript of one reported judgment, and the heading is not a citable case number. Do not cite it as specific case law — consult a Thai-qualified lawyer for the authoritative Dika number and current application.

    Facts

    Engineer claimed copyright over software developed during employment; employer asserted ownership.

    Holding

    Supreme Court line confirms that under Copyright Act §10, copyright in works created during employment in the course of employment duties vests in the employer absent contrary written agreement.

    Reasoning

    §10 establishes the employer-ownership default; commissioned-work scenarios under §11 are distinct and may require written assignment.

    Significance

    Crucial for tech sector; employers should document scope of duties.

    Practical Takeaway

    Employers should clearly define employee duties; freelance/commission engagements need written assignment.

    Cited Statutes

    • Copyright Act B.E. 2537 §10, §11

    This entry summarises a representative line of authority from the Thai Supreme Court (ฎีกา). It is intended for general legal education only and is not a substitute for advice from a Thai-qualified lawyer. Individual Dika case numbers are being verified against primary sources; until then these entries are presented as composite doctrinal summaries.

    Professional Legal Assistance

    When a matter involves investigation, arrest, detention, litigation, or regulatory action, professional legal representation becomes essential.

    Anglo Siam Legal provides experienced legal services across Thailand for both Thai nationals and foreigners.

    feedback.wasThisHelpful