Educational Information Only — Not Legal Advice

    This site provides educational information only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified Thai lawyer for personalized guidance. Laws may change. Full DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

    Skip to main content
    Thai LawKNOWLEDGE AUTHORITY
    Last reviewed: by Anglo Siam Law Editorial Team
    Share:

    Educational Information Only

    The content on this page is for general educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every legal situation is unique. For matters involving investigation, arrest, litigation, or formal proceedings, consult a qualified legal professional.

    Back to Supreme Court Cases
    Cybercrime — Section 14(1)

    Computer Crime Act §14(1) — Scope of 'False Information Causing Damage'

    Public Prosecutor v Defendant

    Updated:
    Supreme Court
    Cybercrime — Section 14(1)
    B.E. 2562 (2019)

    Composite summary — not a single reported case. This entry distils a settled line of Thai Supreme Court (Dika / ฎีกา) authority for legal education. It is not a transcript of one reported judgment, and the heading is not a citable case number. Do not cite it as specific case law — consult a Thai-qualified lawyer for the authoritative Dika number and current application.

    Facts

    Defendant posted online statement alleging financial wrongdoing by a private individual; prosecutor charged under both Penal Code §326 and Computer Crime Act §14(1).

    Holding

    Supreme Court line distinguishes §14(1) from ordinary defamation: §14(1) requires concrete falsity (not mere defamatory opinion) and demonstrable damage; pure-defamation cases should be prosecuted under §326-328.

    Reasoning

    2017 amendment narrowed §14(1) to true 'false information' cases to avoid over-criminalising opinion; harmonisation with defamation regime.

    Significance

    Limits over-broad application of §14(1); guides prosecutors and defence.

    Practical Takeaway

    §14(1) requires concrete falsity + concrete damage; pure opinion is not §14(1) — defamation regime applies.

    Cited Statutes

    • Computer Crime Act B.E. 2550 §14(1)
    • Penal Code §326-328

    This entry summarises a representative line of authority from the Thai Supreme Court (ฎีกา). It is intended for general legal education only and is not a substitute for advice from a Thai-qualified lawyer. Individual Dika case numbers are being verified against primary sources; until then these entries are presented as composite doctrinal summaries.

    Professional Legal Assistance

    When a matter involves investigation, arrest, detention, litigation, or regulatory action, professional legal representation becomes essential.

    Anglo Siam Legal provides experienced legal services across Thailand for both Thai nationals and foreigners.

    feedback.wasThisHelpful